Core Guidance v1 – Stable content
Recording and Transcription
Recordings and transcripts can assist consumers in understanding and reviewing what was said during interactions with legal service providers. However, they must be used carefully and appropriately.
This page explains the scope, limits, and risks associated with recording and transcription in legal service contexts.
Purpose of recording
The primary purpose of recording or transcription should be personal accuracy and record-keeping.
Recordings may help consumers:
- Recall what was said during complex discussions
- Check understanding of advice or explanations
- Review tone, clarity, and commitments made
- Support accurate note-taking
Recording is not a substitute for written confirmation and should not replace clear, written communication.
Limits of transcription
Transcriptions derived from recordings have inherent limitations. They may:
- Miss nuances of tone or emphasis
- Contain unclear or inaudible sections
- Reflect phrasing but not intent
Transcripts should be treated as aids to understanding rather than definitive or authoritative records.
Accuracy and transparency
Where transcripts are created, accuracy and transparency are critical.
Good practice includes:
- Clear identification of speakers
- Marking unclear or inaudible audio explicitly
- Avoiding reinterpretation or “cleaning” that alters meaning
- Keeping original audio files where possible
Transcripts should represent what was said, not what was intended or later inferred.
Use in complaints and disputes
Consumers should exercise caution when relying on recordings or transcripts in complaints or disputes.
Recordings and transcripts:
- Are not certified legal records
- May be challenged or disputed
- Should be supported by written evidence where possible
Written communications, documents, and contemporaneous notes often carry greater weight and clarity.
Responsible use
Recording and transcription should be used responsibly and proportionately.
Consumers should avoid:
- Publishing recordings or transcripts publicly
- Using recordings to intimidate or pressure providers
- Treating recordings as conclusive proof without context
The aim is accurate understanding and fair engagement, not confrontation.
Purpose of this guidance
This guidance exists to help consumers understand both the usefulness and the limits of recordings and transcription.
Used carefully, they can support understanding. Used carelessly, they can introduce risk, confusion, or misinterpretation.
Core Guidance navigation
Select another Core Guidance page:
- Core Guidance overview
- Purpose of This Website
- How Users Should Approach Legal Services
- Understanding Tone and Behaviour
- Communication Discipline
- File Naming, Records, and Time Tracking
- When Things Start to Go Wrong
- Identifying Failures and Transgressions
- Poor Complaints-Handling Behaviour
- Preparing Evidence for a Formal Complaint
- Using AI Tools Safely
- Recording and Transcription