Core Guidance v1 – Stable content

Recording and Transcription

Recordings and transcripts can assist consumers in understanding and reviewing what was said during interactions with legal service providers. However, they must be used carefully and appropriately.

This page explains the scope, limits, and risks associated with recording and transcription in legal service contexts.

Purpose of recording

The primary purpose of recording or transcription should be personal accuracy and record-keeping.

Recordings may help consumers:

Recording is not a substitute for written confirmation and should not replace clear, written communication.

Limits of transcription

Transcriptions derived from recordings have inherent limitations. They may:

Transcripts should be treated as aids to understanding rather than definitive or authoritative records.

Accuracy and transparency

Where transcripts are created, accuracy and transparency are critical.

Good practice includes:

Transcripts should represent what was said, not what was intended or later inferred.

Use in complaints and disputes

Consumers should exercise caution when relying on recordings or transcripts in complaints or disputes.

Recordings and transcripts:

Written communications, documents, and contemporaneous notes often carry greater weight and clarity.

Responsible use

Recording and transcription should be used responsibly and proportionately.

Consumers should avoid:

The aim is accurate understanding and fair engagement, not confrontation.

Purpose of this guidance

This guidance exists to help consumers understand both the usefulness and the limits of recordings and transcription.

Used carefully, they can support understanding. Used carelessly, they can introduce risk, confusion, or misinterpretation.

Core Guidance navigation

Select another Core Guidance page: